Beck
Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20233:22-cv-01616California7,536 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN S. BECK, Case No. 22-cv-1616-BAS-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DISMISSING AMENDED CATANZARITE LAW CORPORATION, COMPLAINT (ECF No. 7); et al., 15 Defendants. (2) TERMINATING TRO 16 APPLICATION (ECF No. 10); 17 (3) TERMINATING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONS (ECF
Nos. 15, 26);
20 (4) TERMINATING REQUESTS FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
AND EARLY NEUTRAL
EVALUATION CONFERENCE
(ECF Nos. 27–28);
24 (5) TERMINATING MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 31); and
26 (6) GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND
28 Plaintiff Justin S. Beck (“Beck”), who is proceeding pro se, filed his 157-page Amended Complaint on January 3, 2023. (See generally Am. Compl., ECF No. 7.) That pleading asserts, inter alia, claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act…