Beck

Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20233:22-cv-01616California7,536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN S. BECK, Case No. 22-cv-1616-BAS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING AMENDED CATANZARITE LAW CORPORATION, COMPLAINT (ECF No. 7); et al., 15 Defendants. (2) TERMINATING TRO 16 APPLICATION (ECF No. 10); 17 (3) TERMINATING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONS (ECF

Nos. 15, 26);

20 (4) TERMINATING REQUESTS FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

AND EARLY NEUTRAL

EVALUATION CONFERENCE

(ECF Nos. 27–28);

24 (5) TERMINATING MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 31); and

26 (6) GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

28 Plaintiff Justin S. Beck (“Beck”), who is proceeding pro se, filed his 157-page Amended Complaint on January 3, 2023. (See generally Am. Compl., ECF No. 7.) That pleading asserts, inter alia, claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.