Parker
Parker v. Manzano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEREK RICHARD PARKER, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00001-RBM-NLS
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
UNITED STATES PROBATION [Doc. 14] OFFICER MIMI MANZANO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Mimi Manzano, Christopher J. Marco, and Ymelda Valenzuela (“Defendants”). (Doc. 14 (“MTD”).) Plaintiff Derek Richard Parker (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, filed a response in opposition to the Motion (Doc. 15), and Defendants filed a reply (Doc. 16). The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (Doc. 20.) For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND For purposes of ruling on the instant Motion, the Court assumes the following facts as alleged in the Complaint are true: Plaintiff is a…