Okai
Okai v. Kaiser Permanente CSC
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20233:22-cv-00112California5,272 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NAA-ANORKOR OKAI, Case No.: 22-CV-112 TWR (BGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) GRANTING
v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
KAISER PERMANENTE CSC, LACEY
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED.
LEE, DIANE NIETHAMER, and OPEIU R. CIV. P. 12(b)(5); (2) GRANTING
LOCAL 30,
IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
16 Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6); (3) AND DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
STRIKE
20 (ECF No. 25)
Presently before the Court is Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.,1 Lacey Lee, and Diane Niethamer’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) and to Strike Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). (ECF No. 25, “Mot.”) Also before the Court are Plaintiff
27 Defendant Kaiser Foundation Health…