Okai

Okai v. Kaiser Permanente CSC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20233:22-cv-00112California5,272 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NAA-ANORKOR OKAI, Case No.: 22-CV-112 TWR (BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

KAISER PERMANENTE CSC, LACEY

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED.

LEE, DIANE NIETHAMER, and OPEIU R. CIV. P. 12(b)(5); (2) GRANTING

LOCAL 30,

IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

16 Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6); (3) AND DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

STRIKE

20 (ECF No. 25)

Presently before the Court is Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.,1 Lacey Lee, and Diane Niethamer’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) and to Strike Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). (ECF No. 25, “Mot.”) Also before the Court are Plaintiff

27 Defendant Kaiser Foundation Health…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.