Bulnes

Bulnes v. Suez WTS Services USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20233:22-cv-01154California3,189 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN BULNES, individually, and on Case No. 22-cv-01154-BAS-AHG behalf of other members of the general 12 public similarly situated, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiff,

PROCEEDINGS TO STATE COURT

14 v. (ECF No. 14)

SUEZ WTS SERVICES USA, INC.,

16 Defendant. 17 18 Defendant Suez WTS Services USA, Inc. removed this case from San Diego County Superior Court on August 5, 2022, asserting federal jurisdiction exists under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). (Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff filed a motion to remand, arguing Defendant’s Notice of Removal fails to show that CAFA’s amount in controversy requirement has been satisfied. (Mot. to Remand, ECF No. 14.) Defendant filed an Opposition (Opp’n, ECF No. 16) and Plaintiff replies (Reply, ECF No. 18). The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.