Baron

Baron v. Staff Benefits Management Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20233:22-cv-00691California3,646 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT BARON, Case No.: 22cv691-LL-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING RENEWED

MOTION TO PROCEED IN

STAFF BENEFITS FORMA PAUPERIS; and MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT Defendants. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

[ECF Nos. 1, 7] 18 On May 16, 2022, Plaintiff Robert Baron filed this civil action against defendants Staff Benefits Management, Inc. (“SBM”), Frank Crivello, Antoinette Bryant, Matt Dobry, and against Doe Defendants 1-20 [ECF No. 1] together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) [ECF No. 2], a motion to appoint counsel [ECF No. 3], and a motion requesting to file litigation by vexatious litigant [ECF No. 4]. On October 11, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff’s IFP motion due to the lack of particularity, definiteness and certainty in the information provided, dismissed his case without prejudice, and dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.