Drake

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 EDISON CORPUZ, individually and on Case No. 22-cv-1085-MMA (JLB) behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS v. [Doc. No. 22]

BAYER CORPORATION,

16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On July 25, 2022, Edison Corpuz (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, filed a putative class action complaint against Defendant Bayer Corporation (“Defendant”). Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). On October 5, 2022, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Doc. No. 22. Plaintiff filed an opposition, Doc. No. 23, to which Defendant replied, Doc. No. 24. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 25. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES…