Hernandez-Garcia
Hernandez-Garcia v. Dana
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENGRACIA HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, Case No.: 21-cv-1673-JAH-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
ISAAC PENHOS DANA, ESTER [Dkt. No. 71]
SUTTON DE SACAL, SAMUEL
PENHOS, ALICIA SACAL DE
PENHOS, Defendants. 18 I. BACKGROUND On February 17, 2023, the law firm Pettit Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin PC (“Firm”) and its attorneys, Jennifer N. Lutz and Christine Y. Dixon (collectively, “Defense Counsel”), filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record (“Motion”) for Defendants Isaac Penhos Dana, Esther Sutton de Sacal, Samuel Penhos, and Alice Sacal (“Defendants”).1 25 26 Defense Counsel note in the Motion that Esther Sutton de Sacal and Alice Sacal were erroneously sued as “Ester Sutton de Sacal” and “Alicia Sacal de Penhos,” 28 Dkt. No. 71. Defense Counsel state that withdrawal as counsel is necessary…