Jayashankar

Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20233:21-cv-02137California258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KIMERA LABS INC., Case No. 21-cv-2137-MMA (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. SEAL

RAJ JAYASHANKAR et al., [Doc. No. 58] Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Plaintiff Kimera Labs Inc. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Raj Jayashankar, Exocel Bio Inc., Alejandro Contreras, Deb Hubers, and Craig Evan Winkels (collectively, “Defendants”) asserting, generally, that Defendants misappropriated its trade secrets in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1836 et seq. See Doc. No. 31. Plaintiff now wishes to file an emergency motion for temporary restraining order, see Doc. No. 59, under seal, see Doc. No. 58. The strong presumption in favor of public access to court records, Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002), may be rebutted by a showing of good cause to seal records attached to nondispositive motions, Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.