Dorsey

Dorsey v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20233:20-cv-00843California535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JESSIE DORSEY, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00843-JAH-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

P. SHAKIBA,

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendant. JUDGMENT.

15 (ECF Nos. 22, 27). 16 On January 20, 2021, Plaintiff Jessie Dorsey (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the operative amended civil rights complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging an Eighth Amendment violation under the United States Constitution at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Center (“RJD”) by Defendant P. Shakiba (“Defendant”), a doctor at RJD. Plaintiff asserts Defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. On August 23, 2022, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment arguing (1) Plaintiff cannot establish the Defendant was deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s medical needs; (2) Plaintiff’s damages are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.