Dalrymple

Dalrymple v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20233:23-cv-00346California752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC GLENN DALRYMPLE, Case No.: 23-CV-346-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16

18 Plaintiff files for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Complaint (“IFP motion”). (Doc. No. 3.) The Court reviews Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when a plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court finds that the Complaint sufficiently states a claim for relief. Additionally, having reviewed and considered the entirety of Plaintiff’s submissions, the Court GRANTS the IFP motion. I. MOTION FOR IFP Plaintiff moves to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.