Lardizabal

Lardizabal v. American Express National Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20233:22-cv-00345California4,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 22cv345-MMA(BLM) GREGORIO LARDIZABAL,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

SECOND MOTION FOR RESOLUTION

v. OF DISCOVERY DISPUTE

ARVEST CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY,

Defendant. [ECF NOS. 127 & 128] 16 Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Resolution of Discovery Dispute [ECF No. 127 (“Motion”)] and Defendant Arvest Bank’s Response to Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Resolution of Discovery Dispute [ECF No. 128 (“Response”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On December 2, 2022, Plaintiff noticed the depositions of two Arvest Bank employees, Pat Bisbee and Wendelette Johnson. Motion at 6. Plaintiff noticed the depositions for December 21, 2022. Id. Two days before the depositions, on December 19, 2022, Defendant informed Plaintiff that Mr. Bisbee and Ms. Johnson were not subject to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.