Clover

Clover v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20233:20-cv-00567California1,229 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON CLOVER, et al., Case No.: 20-CV-567-LAB-WVG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON EX PARTE

v. APPLICATION TO AMEND

DISCOVERY RESPONSE FOR

CAMP PENDLETON & QUANTICO

REQUEST FOR ADMISSION (SET

HOUSING, et al., ONE) PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 36(B) Defendants.

17 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application to Amend Discovery Response 18 for Request for Admissions (Set One) Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 36(b) (“Ex Parte Application” 19 or “Application”). (Doc. No. 96.) Plaintiffs move the Court to grant Plaintiffs leave to 20 amend their response to Defendant’s Request for Admission (“RFA”) No. 18 pursuant to 21 Rule 36(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs explain they inadvertently 22 responded “ADMIT” to RFA No. 18 and instead intended to answer with a denial. For this 23 reason, Plaintiffs seek to correct their response to this single discovery request. 24 In compliance with Civil Chambers Rule VI, Plaintiffs’ Ex …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.