Nogales
Nogales v. Burke
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE NOGALES, CDCR #G-52536, Case No.: 22-cv-702-MMA-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
v. [DKT. NO. 21] ISU OFFICER BURKE, et al., Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff Jose Nogales’ Motion for Appointment of Counsel (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 21. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on a claim filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. Nos. 5, 9. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion without prejudice. II. BACKGROUND The Court summarized Plaintiff’s claims in the June 6, 2022 Order Screening Complaint. Dkt. No. 4 at 2–5, 10–11.1 / /
27 1 When referencing page numbers for documents filed with the Court, the Court’s citation 28 III. LEGAL STANDARD An indigent’s right to appointed counsel exists “only where the litigant may lose his physical liberty if he loses the litigation.” Lassiter v. Dep’t…