Russell

Russell v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20233:21-cv-01029California1,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTINE ANN RUSSELL, Case No.: 21cv1029-LL-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE AND ISSUING ORDER

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant. [ECF No. 45] 16 17 Before the Court is Defendant United States’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (hereinafter “Motion to Dismiss”). ECF No. 45. The Motion to Dismiss is based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with federal rules and the Court’s orders. Id. at 1–2. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a document titled “Memorandum for the Southern District Court of California” about one and a half months after the deadline to file an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 59. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the Motion to Dismiss. Instead, Plaintiff is ORDERED to (1) sign the medical release on or before March 14, 2023 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.