Alonso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRISTOPHER K. ALONSO, Case No.: 23-CV-0005-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

COMPLAINT

IMPERIAL COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE

et al., 14 [Doc. No. 5] Defendants.

16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss on the grounds that 17 the complaint fails to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The motion was filed on 18 January 26, 2023, and set a hearing date (for briefing purposes only) of March 2, 2023. 19 Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2 requires a party opposing a motion to file an opposition or 20 statement of non-opposition no later than fourteen calendar days before the noticed hearing. 21 Thus, based on the hearing date of March 2, 2023, Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to 22 dismiss was due on February 16, 2023. No opposition has been filed. Under the local 23 rules, Plaintiff’s failure to oppose “may constitute a consent to the granting of [the] 24 motion.” See CivLR 7.1.f.3.c. 25 District courts have broad …