Robinson

Robinson v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20233:22-cv-01401California4,306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYVONE ROBINSON, Case No.: 22-cv-01401-GPC-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

J. GALLEGOS, Correctional Counselor,

FRANK SHARPE, Classification and [Dkt. No. 13.] Parole Representative, 16 Defendants.

18 Before the Court is Defendants J. Gallegos and Frank Sharpe’s motion to dismiss 19 for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 20 13.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition. Based on the reasoning below, the Court 21 GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss with leave to amend. 22 23 24 1 Even though the opposition was due on January 13, 2023, (Dkt. No. 14), on January 26, 2023, because Court rescheduled the hearing date, it also granted Plaintiff leave to file an opposition by February 17, 2023. (Dkt. No. 15.) However, to date, no opposition has been filed. Moreover, a failure to file an opposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.