Zarrabian

Zarrabian v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20233:21-cv-01962California1,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOOMAN ZARRABIAN, et al., Case No.: 21-cv-1962-LAB-MDD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

v. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP DISMISS, [Dkt. 11]; and

AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES,

15 et al., 2) DENYING MOTION FOR 16 Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MOOT, [Dkt. 10]. 18 Plaintiffs Hooman Zarrabian and Bahar Bandegan (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are asylum seekers from Iran. After U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) denied their applications for adjustment of status, they brought this suit challenging that decision. They named the following Defendants: USCIS; Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security; and Terri Robinson, Director of the National Benefits Center. Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment and Defendants moved for cross-summary judgment and to dismiss the Complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Having considered the parties’ submissions and the relevant law, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.