Solis

Solis v. CoverGirl Cosmetics

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20233:22-cv-00400California8,577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YERALDINNE SOLIS, Case No. 22-cv-0400-BAS-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO COTY, INC.; NOXELL

DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED.

CORPORATION,

R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) (ECF No. 19); Defendants. and

(2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE

TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Yeraldinne Solis (“Solis”) brings this consumer-protection class action against Defendants Coty, Inc. (“Coty”) and Noxell Corporation (“Noxell,” together with Coty, “Defendants”). She alleges she purchased Defendants’ beauty product marketed as “safe” and “sustainable,” when it contains harmful and carcinogenic chemicals called PFAS. (See generally Am. Compl., ECF No. 13.) Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss (“Motion”). (Mot., ECF No. 19.) Solis opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 20) and Defendants reply (Reply, ECF No. 22.) Having considered the record of this case, the 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.