Cohen

Cohen v. Chenowth

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20233:22-cv-01451California772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KING COHEN, and HEATHER COHEN, Case No.: 22-CV-1451-GPC-WVG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO FILE

OBJECTION; AND

RORY CHENOWTH, and KELLYE (2) DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE

LAUGHERY,

TO FILE AFFIDAVIT Defendants. [ECF No. 42]

17 Plaintiff King Cohen seeks leave to (1) object to a statement contained in Defendant 18 Rory Chenowth’s Declaration and (2) to file an untimely affidavit in opposition to 19 Defendants Rory Chenowth’s and Kellye Laughery’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 42. For 20 the reasons that follow, both motions are denied. 21 Objection to Chenowth’s Declaration 22 In opposition to Cohen’s pending motion for sanctions, Chenowth submitted a 23 declaration, the substance of which involves a statement attesting to his location during the 24 time in which the events giving rise to the motion for sanctions purportedly occurred. See 25 ECF No. 25-1 at 2. This declaration was filed on December 23, 2022,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.