Camuro

Camuro v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20233:20-cv-00969California977 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMANDA C., Case No.: 20-CV-00969-DEB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES

KILILO KIJAKAZI, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. [DKT. NO. 32] 16 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees (“Motion”) pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b)(1) and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. No. 32. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Amanda C. filed this action seeking review of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. Dkt. No. 1. The parties filed a Joint Motion to Remand, which the Court granted. Dkt. Nos. 25, 26. The Clerk of the Court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Dkt. No. 27. Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Motion, the Court 28 awarded Plaintiff $6,619.32 in fees under the Equal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.