Lewis

Lewis v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20233:21-cv-01385California2,771 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On February 14, 2023, the parties contacted the Court with a discovery dispute involving Plaintiff’s Notice of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6)1 Deposition to

20 1 Rule 30(b)(6) provides: 21 In its notice or subpoena, a party may name as the deponent a 22 public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, a governmental agency, or other entity and must describe with reasonable particularity the matters for examination. The named 24 organization must then designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on its behalf; and it may set out the matters on which each 26 person designated will testify . . . . The persons designated must testify about information known or reasonably available to the organization. . . . 28 which Defendant had objected. (ECF 23 at 2. ) Topic 14 of the Notice requests a Rule 30(b)(6) witness on the issue of: “Any and all vacant or unassigned positions at Defendant’s Boston Avenue, Oceanview, and OMDC facilities in 2019.” Following the telephonic discovery conference, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.