Cohen
Cohen v. Chenowth
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KING COHEN and HEATHER COHEN, Case No.: 3:22-CV-1451-GPC-WVG
Plaintiffs,
ORDER:
v. 1. DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE LATE REPLY [ECF
RORY HALE CHENOWTH and No. 43];
KELLYE LAUGHERY,
2. GRANTING MOTION TO Defendants. DISMISS [ECF No. 23]; AND 16 3. DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [ECF No. 19]
18 Pending before the Court is Defendants Rory Chenowth’s and Kellye Laughery’s 19 Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 23, Plaintiffs King and Heather Cohens’ first Amended 20 Complaint, ECF No. 17. King Cohen has responded in opposition to the motion to dismiss. 21 ECF No. 27. Chenowth and Laughery filed a motion for leave to file a late reply, ECF 22 No. 43, but absent good cause for counsel overlooking the deadline and because the matter 23 is moot given the disposition of this order, the motion for leave to file a reply is DENIED. 24 Additionally pending before the Court is King Cohen’s Motion for Sanctions…