Mendez

Mendez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20233:22-cv-02026California2,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 || VICTOR MENDEZ, an Individual, Case No.: 3:22-cv-02026-W-MDD Plaintitt,| ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 15 || MOTION TO REMAND [DOC. 6] || WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC, a Delaware corporation and DOES through 20, inclusive, Defendants. 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Victor Mendez’s Motion to Remand this cas the San Diego Superior Court. (Mot. [Doc. 6].) Defendant opposes. (Opp’n [Doc. 11]. The Court takes the matter under submission and without oral argument. See Civ ||R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Remanc (Doc. 6]. 25 RELEVANT BACKGROUND This case concerns numerous causes of actions arising out of Plaintiff's employmen 9g ||at and ultimate termination from Defendant Walmart. Plaintiff Victor Mendez was at al

||relevant times an employee of Walmart. (Compl., Notice Of Removal Ex. A [Doc. 1-2] }}3-5.) On or about…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.