Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc. v. United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 135, AFL-CIO, CLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20233:23-cv-00413California5,842 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc., Case No.: 23CV413GPC(KSC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. “EMERGENCY MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION”

14 United Food and Commercial Workers,

Local 135, AFL-CIO, CLC, 15 [Dkt. No. 4.] Defendant. 16

17 On March 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint under Section 301(a) of the Labor 18 Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), and an “emergency preliminary 19 injunction”1 enjoining Defendant from striking as threatened on March 7, 2023. (Dkt. 20 Nos. 1, 4.) At the hearing, the Court was informed that a strike commenced on March 9, 21 2023. Pursuant to the Court’s briefing schedule, Defendant filed an opposition on March 22 23 24 25 1 By filing an “emergency motion for preliminary injunction”, it is not clear whether Plaintiff is seeking 26 an “ex parte motion for temporary restraining order” or an expedited “motion for preliminary injunction.” Nonetheless, the Court construes the “emergency…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.