Fisher

Williams v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20233:23-cv-00423California1,884 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY LEE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 23-cv-423-TWR (WVG)

Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING REQUEST TO RAYTHEL FISHER,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

Respondent. (2) DENYING MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL, AND

17 (3) NOTIFYING PETITIONER OF

OPTIONS TO AVOID DISMISSAL

OF PETITION

20 (ECF Nos. 1–3) 21 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner has also filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. (ECF Nos. 2–3.) REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Petitioner has $1.13 in his trust account, (ECF No. 2 at 5), and cannot afford the $5.00 filing fee. Thus, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel states in full: “Could you please…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.