Nia

Nia v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20233:21-cv-01799California3,809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 Mohammad Farshad Abdollah Nia, Case No.: 21-cv-01799-BAS-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Defendant. [ECF 38]

12 On January 17, 2023, at the Court’s instruction, Plaintiff, Mohammad Farshad 13 Abdollah Nia, moved to compel responses to Requests for Production 4, 6, 8, 9, and 41 in 14 his Amended First Set of Requests for Production of Documents (RFPs), to which 15 Defendant, Bank of America, N.A., had objected on November 21, 2023.1 (ECF 38 at 1.)

I. Plaintiff’s RFPs 4, 6, 8, 9, and

17 RFP 4 generally seeks documents identifying all transactions of accountholders in 18 the last six months before the accountholder’s account was closed or suspended, 19 including information about the location of the transaction. (See ECF 38-4 at 12-13.) 20 RFPs 6, 8, and 9 seek Defendant’s communications to Iranian-citizen accountholders that 21 relate to establishing residency in the United States or notify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.