PMA Companies v. Genox Transportation, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20233:20-cv-02540California707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PMA COMPANIES, Case No.: 20-cv-2540-JES-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART JOINT

MOTION TO MODIFY THE

GENOX TRANSPORTATION, INC.,

SCHEDULING ORDER

APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

15 LAIRD TRANSPORTATION, LLC and

DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, [Dkt. No. 126] Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 19 Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation and Joint Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (the “Joint Motion”). Dkt. No. 126. The parties request that all existing pretrial deadlines be continued by nine months. See id. at 5. This is the parties’ fifth request to modify the pretrial schedule. See Dkt. Nos. 45, 62, 86, 110, 126. When the Magistrate Judge previously assigned to the case granted the last request (in part), he made clear to the parties that no further continuances would be granted “[a]bsent extraordinary circumstances.” See Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.