PMA Companies v. Genox Transportation, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PMA COMPANIES, Case No.: 20-cv-2540-JES-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. AND DENYING IN PART JOINT
MOTION TO MODIFY THE
GENOX TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
SCHEDULING ORDER
APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
15 LAIRD TRANSPORTATION, LLC and
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, [Dkt. No. 126] Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 19 Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation and Joint Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (the “Joint Motion”). Dkt. No. 126. The parties request that all existing pretrial deadlines be continued by nine months. See id. at 5. This is the parties’ fifth request to modify the pretrial schedule. See Dkt. Nos. 45, 62, 86, 110, 126. When the Magistrate Judge previously assigned to the case granted the last request (in part), he made clear to the parties that no further continuances would be granted “[a]bsent extraordinary circumstances.” See Dkt. No.…