Hernandez-Garcia

Hernandez-Garcia v. Dana

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20233:21-cv-01673California1,422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENGRACIA HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, Case No.: 21-cv-1673-JAH-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

ISAAC PENHOS DANA, ESTER [Dkt. No. 85]

SUTTON DE SACAL, SAMUEL

PENHOS, ALICIA SACAL DE

PENHOS, Defendants. 18 I. BACKGROUND On March 9, 2023, the law firm San Diego Biz Law APC (“Firm”) and its attorney, Steven Riznyk, filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record (“Motion”) for Defendants Isaac Penhos Dana and Esther Sutton de Sacal (“Defendants”). Dkt. No. 85. Mr. Riznyk states that the Motion is “made on the grounds that the attorney-client relationship between [the Firm] and Defendants has broken down beyond repair,” and because “Defendants

27 Mr. Riznyk notes in the Motion that Esther Sutton de Sacal was erroneously sued as 28 refuse to compensate [the Firm] and its counsel for the services already performed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.