Apodaca

Apodaca v. Weimer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20233:21-cv-01402California2,005 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK A. APODACA, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01402-RBM-LR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

DEPUTY BRYAN WEIMER;

IMPERIAL COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPT.,

16 Defendants. [Doc. 18] 18 On January 12, 2023, Defendants Bryan Weimer (“Defendant Weimer”) and Imperial County Sheriff’s Office (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”). (Doc. 18.) Plaintiff Mark A. Apodaca (“Plaintiff”) did not file an opposition. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed an initial complaint against Defendants on August 4, 2021. (Doc. 1.) Also on August 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) and a Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 3). On January 5, 2022, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.