Landeros

Butler v. Landeros

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20233:22-cv-01602California3,126 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DERRICK BUTLER, Case No. 22cv1602-JO (LR)

CDCR #AV-6839,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2]; 14 (2) DENYING MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL [ECF No. 5];

P. LANDEROS, et al.,

and (3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT Defendants. PURUSANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1) 18 Plaintiff Derrick Butler is a state prisoner incarcerated at Centinela State Prison in Imperial, California (“Centinela”). Proceeding pro se, he has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has also filed a Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. ECF Nos. 2, 5. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP, denies his motion to appoint counsel, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.