Valdez

Valdez v. Zhang

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20233:20-cv-00736California7,194 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO VALDEZ, Case No.: 20-CV-736 JLS (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR

JUDICIAL NOTICE AND

DR. ZHANG et al., (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY Defendants.

JUDGMENT

17 (ECF Nos. 64, 64-1) 18 19 20 21 Presently before the Court are Defendants R. Zhang, B. Martin, and L. Schobelock’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 64) and Request for Judicial Notice in support of the same (ECF No. 64-1). Plaintiff Ricardo Valdez filed a Response in Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 86), and Defendants filed a Reply in Support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 87), the Motion for Summary Judgment. Having / / / / / / carefully considered the Parties’ briefing and the law, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice and GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.1 BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.