Sarcuni

Sarcuni v. bZx DAO

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20233:22-cv-00618California10,275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTIAN SARCUNI, et al., on Case No.: 22-cv-618-LAB-DEB behalf of themselves and other 12 similarly situated, ORDER: 13 Plaintiffs, 1) DENYING IN PART AND 14 v. GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS, [Dkt. 27]; bZx DAO, et al,

16 Defendants. 2) DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE, [Dkt. 27]; and

18 3) DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS, [Dkt. 31] 20 In what appears to be a case of first impression, nineteen named Plaintiffs brought this putative class action against Kyle Kistner, Tom Bean, bZeroX LLC, Leveragebox LLC (collectively, the “Leveragebox Defendants”), Hashed International LLC, and AGE Crypto GP, LLC (the “Hashed Defendants,” and, together with the Leveragebox Defendants, “Defendants”) as members of a general partnership for one count of negligence. (Dkt. 21, First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)). Plaintiffs allege that each Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.