Moore

Moore v. Palmer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20233:22-cv-00539California4,071 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH C. MOORE, Case No.: 22-CV-539 JLS (LR)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL

M. PALMER, Deputy Warden;

NOTICE; (2) DENYING

D. LEWIS, Associate Warden;

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

A. TAYLOR; A MEZA; R. CENTENO;

EVIDENTIARY HEARING; AND

and CHRISTOPHER DAUB, (3) DENYING WITHOUT Defendants. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

19 (ECF No. 29)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Joseph C. Moore’s (“Plaintiff” or “Moore”) “Request for Evidentiary Hearing & Preliminary Injunction” (“Mot.,” ECF No. 29). The Court requested briefing on the Motion. See ECF No. 30. Defendants M. Palmer, D. / / / / / / / / / Lewis, A. Taylor-Garcia, C. Meza, R. Centeno, and C. Daub (collectively, “Defendants”)1 filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 32), and Plaintiff filed a Reply in support of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.