Tan

Tan v. Quick Box, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20233:20-cv-01082California4,517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEANNE TAN, an individual, on Case No.: 20-cv-1082-LL-DDL behalf of herself and all others 12 similarly situated, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR Plaintiff,

EVIDENTIARY SANCTIONS

14 v. 15 KONNEKTIVE REWARDS, LLC, et [Dkt. No. 254] al., Defendants. 18 Before the Court is the Konnektive Defendants’ Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence Against Plaintiff Leanne Tan (the “Motion”). Dkt. No. 254. The Quick Box Defendants2 join the Motion. Dkt. No. 255. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED. 23 24 25 The “Konnektive Defendants” are Konnektive Corporation, Konnektive LLC, Konnektive Rewards LLC, Kathryn Martorano, and Matthew Martorano. The “Quick Box Defendants” are Quick Box LLC, Stephen Adelé, Chad Biggins, and James Martell. The Court refers to the Konnektive Defendants and 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.