FitTrack, Inc. v. Hyperzoo Technology Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20233:23-cv-00536California5,214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FITTRACK INC., a Canadian Case No.: 23-CV-536 TWR (NLS) Corporation,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, (1) GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

EX PARTE MOTION FOR

HYPERZOO TECHNOLOGY LTD., a TEMPORARY RESTRAINING UK entity; SHENZHEN DINGKA

ORDER, ASSET RESTRAINING

TECHNOLOGY, LTD., a Chinese entity;

ORDER, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

KENNETH and TERESA BRANCH, ORDER, AND SERVICE OF individuals residing in Virginia;

PROCESS BY EMAIL AND

GOLDEN TULIP, LLC, a Wyoming

PUBLICATION;

limited liability company; and DOES 19 1–25, (2) SETTING HEARING AND 20 Defendants. BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION;

(3) ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY VENUE IS

PROPER

25 (ECF No. 6)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Entry of (1) Temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.