FitTrack, Inc. v. Hyperzoo Technology Ltd.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20233:23-cv-00536California5,214 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FITTRACK INC., a Canadian Case No.: 23-CV-536 TWR (NLS) Corporation,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, (1) GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
EX PARTE MOTION FOR
HYPERZOO TECHNOLOGY LTD., a TEMPORARY RESTRAINING UK entity; SHENZHEN DINGKA
ORDER, ASSET RESTRAINING
TECHNOLOGY, LTD., a Chinese entity;
ORDER, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
KENNETH and TERESA BRANCH, ORDER, AND SERVICE OF individuals residing in Virginia;
PROCESS BY EMAIL AND
GOLDEN TULIP, LLC, a Wyoming
PUBLICATION;
limited liability company; and DOES 19 1–25, (2) SETTING HEARING AND 20 Defendants. BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION;
(3) ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY VENUE IS
PROPER
25 (ECF No. 6)
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Entry of (1) Temporary…