Morgan

Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20233:20-cv-00574California9,934 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL MORGAN and MICHAEL Case No.: 3:20-cv-00574-GPC-AHG BEVAN, individually and on behalf of ORDER RESOLVING JOINT others similarly situated,

MOTION REGARDING MOTIONS

13 Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL 14 v. [ECF No. 145] 15 ROHR, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion, Opposition to Compel Responses to Defendant’s Requests for Admission, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One. ECF No. 145. The Joint Motion concerns Defendants’ request, pursuant to Rules 33 and 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the Court compel Plaintiffs to provide supplemental responses to Defendants’ Requests for Admission (“RFAs”) Nos. 9-11, 17-20 and the Special Interrogatories (“ROGs”) corresponding to those RFAs, as well as further supplemental responses to Defendants’ ROGs Nos. 5, 6, 15 and 21-23. Additionally, Plaintiffs raise a new issue in the Joint Motion that arose the day the motion was filed, during the deposition of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.