Wright

Wright v. Mayorkas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20233:23-cv-00511California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN D. OMAR WRIGHT, Case No.: 23-CV-511 JLS (BLM)

Petitioner,

ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION

v. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS; (2) DENYING

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al.,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION

Respondents. TO APPOINT COUNSEL; AND (3) DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

17 (ECF Nos. 1–3) 18 Petitioner Shawn D. Omar Wright (“Petitioner”), a detainee in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See ECF No. 1 (“Pet.”). Petitioner has also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2) and a Motion to Appoint Counsel (“Counsel Mot.,” ECF No. 3). Having reviewed Petitioner’s filings and the applicable law and for the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the IFP Motion, DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.