Rodgers

Rodgers v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20233:21-cv-01534California9,552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CEDRIC RODGERS, Case No.: 21-cv-1534-GPC-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND

v. DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

REPORT AND

Commissioner of Social Security, RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING Defendant. IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND

REMANDING THE CASE

18 [ECF No. 11] 19 On August 30, 2021, Plaintiff Cedric Rodgers (“Plaintiff” or “Rodgers”) filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”). ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). On February 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 11. On March 10, 2022, Defendant filed a Response, (ECF No. 12), and on March 24, 2022,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.