Eastman

Eastman v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20233:21-cv-00655California10,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK EASTMAN, Case No.: 21cv655-GPC(KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND

v. DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART

REPORT AND

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

RECOMMENDATION AND

Commissioner of Social Security, REMANDING TO THE Defendant. COMMISSIONER

[Dkt. No. 17.]

18 On April 14, 2021, Plaintiff Mark Eastman (“Plaintiff”), with counsel, filed this 19 action seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying 20 his application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social 21 Security Act (“Act”). (Dkt. No. 1.) Pursuant to the Magistrate Judge’s scheduling 22 order, the parties filed a joint motion for judicial review. (Dkt. Nos. 13, 17.) On January 23 30, 2023, Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford issued a report and recommendation 24 (“Report”) that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. (Dkt. No. 16.) Plaintiff 25 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.