Thompson

Thompson v. NSC Technologies, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20233:20-cv-00371California4,721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 A RTHUR THOMPSON, an individual, CA SE NO. 3:20-CV-00371-JO-MSB and on behalf of others similarly situated,

Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING v. (1) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS

NSC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Virginia ACTION SETTLEMENT AND (2) limited liability corporation; BAE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,

inclusive,

Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff Arthur Thompson’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs came on regularly for hearing on March 29, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable Jinsook Ohta, district judge presiding. The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s motions, the Declarations of Class and Plaintiff’s counsel Matthew J. Matern and Jarrod Salinas of Phoenix Settlement Administrators, and all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.