Sundby

Sundby v. Marquee Funding Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20233:19-cv-00390California620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DALE SUNDBY, Trustee,, Case No.: 19-CV-0390-GPC-AHG 21-CV-2013-GPC-AHG Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE PLAINTIFF DALE

SUNDBY’S IMPROPER USE OF

MARQUEE FUNDING GROUP, et al.,

OBJECTIONS

Defendants. 16 On December 15, 2022, the Court issued an Order mandating that legal representation be obtained on behalf of the Dale H. Sundby and Edith Littlefield Sundby, Trust No. 1989-1 dated January 26, 1989. ECF No. 310. Plaintiff Dale Sundby objected to this Order. ECF No. 312. On March 17, 2023, after inviting briefing on the issue, ECF No. 313, the Court reaffirmed its December 2022 Order and clarified that it interpreted “Sundby’s objections to have been a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from an order.” ECF No. 324 at 5 n.4. Sundby objected to the March 17, 2023 Order. ECF No. 325. The Court issued a notice explaining that the deadline from the March 17, 2023 Order was still in effect but declining to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.