Reed
Reed v. Paramo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (DEB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO STAY
14 (ECF Nos. 274) D. PARAMO, et al., Defendants.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed’s Motion to Stay (“Mot.,” ECF No. 274). The Motion requests “all proceedings be delayed 90 days.” Id. at 3. Plaintiff represents that “he is in no position nor condition to proceed at this current time.” Id. (emphasis in original). In October 2022, Plaintiff moved for an indefinite stay of this matter. See generally ECF No. 263. However, on November 1, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff’s request without prejudice. See generally ECF No. 264. In so doing, the Court apprised Plaintiff of the legal standard applied to motions to stay, including the fact that the party requesting a stay has the burden of establishing that the requested stay is warranted, and explained why the 27 …