Neill

Neill v. YMCA of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20233:23-cv-00457California1,098 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGEL MICHAEL NEILL, Case No.: 23-CV-457 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

YMCA OF SAN DIEGO, (ECF No. 2) Defendant.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Angel Michael Neill’s (“Plaintiff”) Request for Appointment of Counsel (“Req.,” ECF No. 2). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Request and the law, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Request for the reasons that follow. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, initiated this action on March 14, 2023, by filing a Complaint utilizing this District’s Form Complaint. See ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). He subsequently filed some additional exhibits thereto (ECF No. 4) and an “Amend[ed] Complaint” (“FAC,” ECF No. 6). Liberally construed, Plaintiff’s pleadings appear to raise one or more claims for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.