John Doe v. Regents of The University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20233:22-cv-01506California7,138 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE, Case No.: 22-CV-1506 JLS (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR

JUDICIAL NOTICE; (2) GRANTING

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

CALIFORNIA and DOES 1 through 10, JUDICIAL NOTICE; AND inclusive, (3) GRANTING IN PART AND 16 Defendants. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

(ECF Nos. 19, 19-3, 24-2) 20 21 Presently before the Court is Defendant Regents of the University of California’s (“Defendant” or “Regents”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 19) and Request for Judicial Notice (ECF No. 19-3) in support of the same. Plaintiff John Doe filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 24), which was accompanied by a Request for Judicial Notice (ECF No. 24-2). Defendant then filed a Reply in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.