Frazier

Richardson v. Frazier

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20233:22-cv-01447California1,032 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN RICHARDSON, Case No.: 22-CV-1447 TWR (AHG)

Petitioner,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION

v. TO AMEND OR ALTER THE

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

14 FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e), AND FRAZIER, Warden, (2) DENYING CERTIFICATE OF Respondent. APPEALABILITY

(ECF No. 15)

18 On September 22, 2022, Petitioner Kevin Richardson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (See ECF No. 1 (“Pet.”).) On October 25, 2022, the Court dismissed it for failure to state a cognizable claim. (See ECF No. 4.) Petitioner was given leave to amend his petition, (see id. at 5), and he did so on November 29, 2022. (See ECF Nos. 5, 6.) The Court dismissed the amended petition for failure to state a cognizable claim on January 9, 2023, and gave Petitioner one final opportunity to amend. (See ECF No. 7.) On March 6, 2023, 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.