Griffin

Griffin v. Hodges

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20233:21-cv-01474California6,728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAROLD GRIFFIN, Case No. 21-cv-1474-MMA (DEB)

CDCR #G-18368,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SUMMARY vs. JUDGMENT

[Doc. No. 28]

DR. P. SHAKIBA,

Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Harold Griffin (“Plaintiff”), a California inmate proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting that Dr. P. Shakiba (“Defendant” or “Dr. Shakiba”) violated his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. See Doc. No. 6 (“FAC”). Defendant now moves for summary judgment. See Doc. No. 28. Plaintiff filed an opposition, to which Defendant replied. Doc. Nos. 32, 33. The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.