Renna

Renna v. Becerra

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20233:20-cv-02190California11,369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANA RAE RENNA, et al., Case No.: 20-cv-2190-DMS-DEB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

ROBERT BONTA, Attorney General of

INJUNCTION

California; and ALLISON MENDOZA, 15 Director of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms, Defendants. 18 Plaintiffs seek to enjoin enforcement of California’s handgun “roster” requirements, which have prohibited the manufacture and retail sale in California of a large segment of modern handguns that are otherwise in common use throughout the United States for self- defense and other lawful purposes. The challenged roster requirements are codified in California’s Unsafe Handgun Act (“UHA”) and limit handgun manufacturing and retail sales to those handguns that can satisfy numerous testing and safety feature requirements not required in 47 other states. As a result, Plaintiffs allege no modern handguns…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.