ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20233:21-cv-01305California3,916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 IMPRIMISRX, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v.

(1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF

OSRX, INC.; OCULAR SCIENCE, INC., No. 94); AND Defendants. (2) GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON

THE PLEADINGS (ECF No. 96)

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 94) and Defendants’ Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 96). Having considered the parties’ filings, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike and GRANTS IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. I. BACKGROUND On July 20, 2021, Plaintiff commenced this action and filed a Complaint alleging false advertising, trademark infringement, false designation of origin, common law unfair competition, copyright infringement, and violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.