Osman

Osman v. Intact Insurnace Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20233:23-cv-00503California1,372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABDISALAM BASHI OSMAN, Case No.: 23CV503-GPC(DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOLLOWING ORDER TO

v. SHOW CAUSE AND REMANDING

CASE TO STATE COURT FOR

INTACT INSURANCE COMPANY,

LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

Defendant. JURISDICTION 16 On March 20, 2023, Defendant Homeland Insurance Company of New York (“Homeland”), erroneously sued as Intact Insurance Company, removed the case to this Court alleging federal diversity jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 1, Not. of Removal at 2-3.1) On March 29, 2023, the Court issued an order to show cause why the case should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction for failing to plausibly allege the amount in controversy. (Dkt. No. 5.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court REMANDS the case to San Diego Superior Court. / / /

26 1 Page numbers are based on the CM/ECF pagination. 2 Diversity of citizenship has been satisfied because the notice of removal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.