Hartman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES AND ELIZABETH CONSOLE Case No.: 22-CV-1237-DMS-JLB

FAMILY,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, RECONSIDERATION AND v. ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE

ANTHONY MARK HARTMAN,

PRIVATE PLACEMENT CAPITAL

NOTES II, LLC Defendants. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of its Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Substitution of Service on an Attorney (ECF No. 9). Motions for reconsideration “should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law.” McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir. 1999). Plaintiffs ask the Court to reconsider permitting Plaintiff to effect service on Mr. William Norman Nettles, whom Plaintiff believes to be Defendant Anthony Mark Hartman’s attorney in…